This movie requires Flash Player 8. Download Flash Player 8

 
America's Culture War: Abortion

Search :

The U.S. Senate and the Definition of Marriage

by  Dave Miller, Ph.D.

What do you consider to be the most pressing social/political concerns in America? The Iraq War? High gasoline prices? Illegal immigration? Tax increases? Rising health-care costs? The environment? While these issues merit some legitimate concern, the fact is, if Jesus Christ were to return today to terminate human history and usher in eternity, such issues would hold little significance. The Bible teaches that one must be spiritually-minded, transcending mere physical, earthly concerns to view life spiritually (Romans 8:6). Sometimes we become so entwined in daily living that we “can’t see the forest for the trees.” Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for failing to “discern the signs of the times” (Matthew 16:3).

Both history and eternity will surely verify that the two premiere issues confronting American civilization at this moment in time are same-sex marriage and the murder of innocent unborn children. Biblical precedent exists for recognizing that on the basis of these two issues alone, the God of the Universe will inevitably unleash His fury on the nation (e.g., Genesis 19; Deuteronomy 18:9-12; 2 Kings 17:17-18). The survival of America unquestionably teeters on these two critical cultural issues.

If that be the case, Americans ought to be ashamed, alarmed, and outraged that not even half of the senators of these 50 United States were willing to vote in favor of a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage (“U.S. Senate...,” 2006). That means that they do not want to allow the American people to decide whether to amend the federal Constitution to define marriage. Never mind the fact that 45 states have already approved either state constitutional amendments or statutes to define traditional marriage in a way that would bar same-sex marriage (Kellman, 2006; Murray, 2006). Never mind the fact that 20 states have already passed state constitution amendments by overwhelming majorities (Weber, 2006). The unmitigated gall and defiant audacity of activist judges are seen in the fact that they have already struck down voter-approved marriage amendments in both Nebraska and Georgia (Peterson, 2006; Lochhead, 2006).

The Founders of the American republic would never have even entertained a discussion challenging the biblical definition of marriage. They knew and believed that the family was designed and created by God to be the fundamental building block of society (Genesis 1:27; 2:24). They surely could never have imagined that half of the United States Senate would one day fail to stand firmly and forthrightly on what constitutes a marriage.

REFERENCES

Kellman, Laurie (2006), “Senate Rejects Amendment on Gay Marriage,” Associated Press, June 7, [On-line], URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060607/ap_on_go_co/gay_marriage.

Murray, Shailagh (2006), “Gay Marriage Amendment Fails in Senate,” Washington Post, June 8, [On-line], URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/07/AR20060 60700830.html.

Lochhead, Carolyn (2006), “Senate Marriage Ban Amendment Rejected,” San Francisco Chronicle, June 8, [On-line], URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/08/MARRIAGE.TMP.

Peterson, Kavan (2006), “Washington Gay Marriage Ruling Looms,” Stateline.org, March 29, [On-line], URL: http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=136&languageId=1& contentId=20695.

“U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress—2nd Session” (2006), United States Senate, [On-line], URL: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm? congress=109&session=2&vote=00163.

Weber, Walter (2006), “No Excuses,” National Review Online, June 2, [On-line], URL: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=N2YxNzMzN2RiNDNhNjAyZWYzODNkNjYwYmQ1M GIwMTc=.




Copyright © 2006 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

We are happy to grant permission for items in the "America's Culture War" section to be reproduced in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the author’s name must remain attached to the materials; (4) any references, footnotes, or endnotes that accompany the article must be included with any written reproduction of the article; (5) alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, quotations, etc. must be reproduced exactly as they appear in the original); (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, in whole or in part, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
U.S.A.
Phone (334) 272-8558

http://www.apologeticspress.org